The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:49, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GlobalPlatform (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While there is some evidence of notability, in my opinion there isn't quite enough to pass the "received significant coverage" requirements of WP:GNG. --Guy Macon (talk) 13:54, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UICC configuration. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 July 31. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Offline} 14:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:29, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Clearly not notable The article is terrible, I wasn't even sure what it was about but I found the home page and this appears to be a standards group for the Internet focusing on IoT (Internet of things). There are no reliable sources in the article and when I did a google search all I found were the home page for the standards group and references on various web sites. Even on the page for news article on the group's site there are no articles in IT magazines or general newspapers or news sites such as CNN, NY Times, or lesser known sources. All they have are their own press releases and press releases from vendors participating in the standard. If they can't even find 3rd party articles about the standard then they almost certainly don't exist. Definitely delete. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 17:17, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.