The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Scouts Australia . MBisanz ^talk 01:21, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Glossary of Australian Scouting terms[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per very brief discussion, this is considered a non-notable topic. I'd prefer to see any truly notable terms merged into Scouts Australia than have this deleted outright. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 12:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 12:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 12:22, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP is not supposed to be a dictionary or glossary. I know that other stuff exists, but would like to see them nominated too. Rather see the list hosted on another site and linked from main article.Borock (talk) 15:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Although Wikipedia is not a dictionary, stand-alone glossaries are an acceptable kind of list article. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Glossaries. That said, I'm not certain this list meets other criteria such as notability and independent sourcing. Color me neutral toward this deletion discussion. Cnilep (talk) 23:54, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:31, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This article has concerned me for a long time, but I hoped it might develop into something useful, or be changed by the author involved. This has not happened. It is time for it to go. There are no similar articles for Scouting in other places. It is also largely specific to Scouts Australia. --Bduke (Discussion) 21:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Decimate and merge per nom.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Question - I don't see a Glossary of scouting terms, which would seem to have a much easier time satisfying WP:LISTN, but I don't know the extent to which these only apply to Australian Scouting? — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:00, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.