The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And move as suggested. Sandstein 17:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gnostic saints[edit]

Gnostic saints (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only one article listed here. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 12:22, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:45, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete then rename Gnostic saints (Christian) to Gnostic saints. It seems this previously had other articles on the DAB page which have since been deleted and a disambig shouldn't have 1 article listed, as it's not then serving a purpose. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 19:09, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and move, as above. Could just have been an unctontroversial WP:RM? PamD 09:09, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. No need for a disambig for only one article Rollidan (talk) 21:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and move as suggested. Bearian (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.