The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 00:02, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GoFindFriends[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional type article for social network. Of the four links provided, the NY Post is an in depth, reliable source, but other than that, I can't find any in depth coverage. The WSJ link is a trivial mention, not about the company. There doesn't seem to be any other coverage. From what I can tell, it doesn't look like this meets the WP:GNG or WP:CORP. FuriouslySerene (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. FuriouslySerene (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 19:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 19:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Musa^Talk ☻ 19:32, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of the current article suggests better satisfying the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - notability not established Shritwod (talk) 19:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - NY Post and FOX5NY had in depth coverage. Not much, but way ahead of most articles that has an AfD. --OpenFuture (talk) 14:29, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure a two minute interview on a local TV channel qualifies as significant coverage. FuriouslySerene (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.