The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GoLance[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Company lacks notability and should be deleted on those grounds. This was deleted as G11 and then identically recreated about an hour later and I think can be deleted on those grounds as well. Barkeep49 (talk) 21:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 21:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Barkeep49 (talk) 21:47, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A non-notable company mostly with passing mentions. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 21:51, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article reads more like advertising.TH1980 (talk) 04:24, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to trim all the advertising content from the article. Please, have a look at it. Gerlimheers (talk) 05:17, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely less promotional. Has WP:OVERCITE issues now, however. This doesn't change what appears to be a lack of notability under WP:NCORP. I still am unaware of multiple independent reliable secondary sources discussing the company in significant detail that would establish notability. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 05:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I understood why it was deleted under G11. Can you please tell me why you think this lacks notability? Thanks, Gerlimheers (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NCORP describes what kind of sources are necessary for an article on a company. I am suggesting, and so far other editors are agreeing with me, that this company does not have those kinds of sources about them. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It won Stevie Awards and there are links from Forbes[1]. Do you think these help to establish notability? Gerlimheers (talk) 17:31, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per WP:NOTLINKEDIN article is about a non notable organization that is written as though it were a resumé.Celestina007 (talk) 12:20 07 December 2019 (UTC)
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW. I see zero independent sources primarily about this company. We are a charity, not a free webhost for businesses. Bearian (talk) 18:01, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable company. Wikipedia is not a Soapbox. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 21:35, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.