The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 21:54, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Goetic demons in popular culture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A graveyard for fancruft. While the Goetic demons as a group are notable, there is no indication that their portrayal in modern fiction, as such, is covered in reliable sources. Accordingly, this fails WP:LISTN. The content as a whole is mostly unsourced or sourced only to passing mentions in pop culture ephemera. Sandstein 18:37, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --John M Wolfson (talk) 19:19, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nominator. Pure fancruft. Callmemirela 🍁 ^talk 19:39, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Obviously just a place where they stuck all the unnecessary "in popular culture" sections. Still unnecessary as a whole._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 02:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.