The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:23, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gold Souk Grande Mall Chennai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ORG. no indepth coverage, just small mentions in gnews eg a cinema opening there. [1]. LibStar (talk) 01:48, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter (post) @ 21:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:18, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Anyone got the Tamil name handy? Its a fairly significant-sized project.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 03:54, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's not necessary, malls in Chennai are more likely to be covered by The Hindu and The Times of India than by Dinamalar or Dinathanthi, but it transliterates to 'கோல்ட் சூக் கிராண்டே மால்" or "கோல்ட் சூக் கிராண்ட் மால்" (removing the accented e from grande). e.g. compare coverage for Ampa Skywalk (அம்பா ஸ்கைவாக்). —SpacemanSpiff 09:57, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Question Can someone explain the meaning of 8,00,000 sq ft? (in the article, entered in the article as given in the source). If it means 800,000 sq ft, the mall is unlikely to be notable ;if it means 8,000,000 , irt probably is or will be. DGG ( talk ) 00:58, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buffbills7701 20:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 19:21, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.