The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Flanaess. SoWhy 07:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gran March[edit]

Gran March (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 19:02, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 19:02, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- the tag says it all "describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily in-universe style". K.e.coffman (talk) 19:29, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this is one of many fictional subdivisions of fictional settings for D&D. It is trivial. Power~enwiki (talk) 23:27, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge to Flanaess. BOZ (talk) 04:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Deletion is not cleanup. Since we're just the same five or six people repeating ourselves in a petty e-crusade on a tabletop game, I'll just link to what I said on the Land of Geoff. Merge with Flanaess. Borderlandor (talk) 05:29, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect then; there's nothing to merge as the article does not cite independent sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Again, independent sourcing is needed for WP:N, not WP:V, so the lack of independent sourcing does not impair this topic's mergeability. Jclemens (talk) 05:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the article as not notable (trivia) and redirect the name, as suggested above. Kierzek (talk) 20:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per BOZ and WP:ATD-M. Jclemens (talk) 05:00, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per established notability. --24.112.231.178 (talk) 19:15, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and Redirect to Flanaess. The article lacks even a single citation. Zero citations = WP:V FAIL = nothing to merge. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:25, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I've no opposition to a merge and redirect if there's a suitable target and someone is willing to do the legwork, but there's no good reason to keep this article unless some third-party sources can be identified. Josh Milburn (talk) 04:39, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.