The result was keep. There is a weak consensus here that this can be more than a dictionary definition. Davewild (talk) 07:52, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary by being about the meaning and use of a word. The article has been a cause of dispute as can be seen on its talk page. An article on the people themselves would be fine (if well sourced) but not under a name that is said to be controversial and sometimes offensive.Jaque Hammer (talk) 01:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]