The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 07:22, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
All the citations have a relation to the subject, no reliable third-party sources have been added DemonBarberTodd (talk) 21:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DustiSPEAK!! 04:02, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Absence of secondary sources about the subject. —C.Fred (talk) 01:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.