The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of The Demonata characters. (non-admin closure) --Mdann52talk to me! 07:29, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grubbs Grady (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced in-universe biog of fictional characte, all of which is essentially plot summary. Some of content could be merged to List of The Demonata characters, but this much detail is uneccessary. TheLongTone (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now - I think it could be further improved given that he is the protagonist in several of the books. On a side note, Characters in The Demonata would be a bit too much I think. DJAMP4444 15:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable character. Characters receive separate pages either because they are culturally important beyond their role in a work (e.g. Prince Hamlet, Albus Dumbledore, Shaggy Rogers) or because there is important material that can't be included in the main article on the work/series/author for reasons of length, balance, or comprehensibility. There's no evidence that this character has received any attention from third-party sources to indicate any cultural importance or critical study. It would be more fitting to add a short bio either to the main article on the series, or possibly spin out character bios to Characters in The Demonata, but I think in the first instance, adding content to the main page is better. I don't suggest a merge because it shouldn't be merged as it stands (excessive plot detail). --Colapeninsula (talk) 16:30, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Got the list of characters article wrong, have corrected.TheLongTone (talk) 17:10, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:GNG, also per Colapeninsula. --Bejnar (talk) 21:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or redirect to The Demonata. We really cannot allow multiple articles on a fcitional franchise. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:55, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.