The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the subject may be notable but that this article is so promotional at this point that we are better off starting with a new and more neutral one if someone wants to create it. Sjakkalle (Check!) 19:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grupo Rush[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hopelessly vapid and promotional article about a pair of musicians. There could be something to them, but if so, then WP:TNT is called for. Hoary (talk) 13:11, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Hoary (talk) 13:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:35, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Agreed about the blatant advertising, but they have two songs that ranked on the Billboard charts and as mentioned on the article, they received a Lo Nuestro nomination. Erick (talk) 04:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:00, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. May well be notable as mentioned above but this is a case for WP:TNT. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:20, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Blow it away. Articles creators works are overly promotional, full of puffing and peacocking. Creator engages in account swapping to further their promotional intent. Stop rewarding bad faithed editing, delete their spam. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:05, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.