- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The nomination was based upon vandalism to the article, which was reverted shortly after nomination. (non-admin closure) — Jkudlick tcs 17:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Gu Gu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am curious. The article starts as "Gu Gu (Chinese: 古古) is a male butt hole named my Niggy at the Beijing Zoo," Galaxy Kid (talk) 13:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 13:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Once the vandalism was reverted, it is clear that the page is about a panda. There seem to be good references in international media, so what exactly are you citing as a reason for deletion? JMWt (talk) 14:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- When I read, the article started like that. How i will know it was vandalized. That's how i read it.Galaxy Kid (talk) 15:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Let's ignore that this nomination was provoked by a misreading of temporarily vandalized text. This panda has made news headlines three times in three separate attacks on humans. If there had just been one attack, it could possibly be dismissed as a non-encyclopedic, news-of-the-weird story. But three times? It's getting more difficult to dismiss. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep nom appears to have been based on some vandalism. Quick search shows some good coverage. [1][2][3] WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 16:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.