The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Habbo. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 16:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Habbo China[edit]

Habbo China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable website that isnt even up anymore. Why is this any more notable then other countries's Habbo? Blake (talk) 02:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect Seems like it should be redirected to the main Habbo article. And anythign worthwhile included there? ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• -I dont think there is anything worth putting in the Habbo article, but I agree that it should redirect. I was just wondering if that one reference about it closing due to the economy in China was enough to keep the article alive. --Blake (talk) 19:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I would say Merge and redirect. if there is anything worth merging. It seems well written, I would hate to waste it. I feel that Habbo deserves an article. However, Habbo China does not. Gosox5555 (talk) 03:27, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.