The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources aren't perfect but notability does seem to be there, Give it a year or 2 & I'd imagine sources will improve. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Halle Mordu[edit]

Halle Mordu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. No evidence of notability perhaps WP:TOOSOON. Sources provided have no editorial control. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Sufficient sources to establish notability. Systemic bias is a bug, not a feature. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:09, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources provided are reliable. Sources with no editorial control or oversight cannot be used to establish notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 15:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, agree with The Drover's Wife regarding Wikipedia's problem with WP:BIAS. There are additional sources available at Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL, specifically in the first link of simple web searches, that could be useful to perform Quality improvement efforts on the article. Good luck, — Cirt (talk) 04:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.