The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. This term is put into context so it is not a mere dictionary definition. Plus there is a clear consensus to Keep this article. Liz Read! Talk! 07:31, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hang noodles on the ears (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nonnotable Russian idiom - Altenmann >talk 21:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable? It's been used in English-language news content https://www.independent.co.uk/news/putin-russian-noodles-mikhail-abdalkin-b2288982.html Pecklesteiner (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Each language has zillions of idioms. The fact that a newspaper gave an english-language equivalent (basically a dicdef) does not make it notable. You need more than that to be an encyclopedic aryicle - Altenmann >talk 23:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There's a National Geographic book with this phrase in its title and a book review of it in Wired. I added a few more usages. If there's a "List of Russian Idioms" I'd say merge this content there, but there doesn't appear to be one. And before you !vote delete, remember that the Flying Spaghetti Monster is always watching and would want us all to hang noodles on our ears. BBQboffin (talk) 02:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No matter how many usage cases you add, a dicdef remains a dicdef. - Altenmann >talk 16:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But when William Safire in the NYT calls Mikhail Gorbachev's usage of it "the most memorable line spoken" in the 1991 Soviet coup[1], it goes from being one of "zillions of idioms" to one that has sustained notability in reliable sources. Now get these noodles of yours off my ears, or else please bring me a pot of simmering marinara sauce and some garlic bread. Cheers! BBQboffingrill me 23:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, please cite the applicable items from WP:GNG and garlic bread is on me. As for me, I fail to see a critical criterion satisfied, namely "significant coverage", beyond dicdef and usage cases. Probably noodles on my eyes :-) Anyway, your efforts to save the article are appreciated. - Altenmann >talk 00:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 10:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article is no more than a dicdef, with etimologies of dubious provenance, and a bunch of use cases. But I admit this may be one of rare cases of WP:IAR. - Altenmann >talk 16:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

keep, as native speaker. This is really well known idiom, and widely used too.
As one from recent high-profile cases, directly related with this idiom: news about one from regional deputy, who listened to Putin's message with noodles on his ears and posted a photo with his sarcastic commentary. As a result, he was fined 150,000 rubles (about $1,500) on the grounds of "discrediting the Russian army" (don't ask what the connection is here!). So this idiom seems quite significant. Kaganer (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, we don’t ignore any rules. This is a stable phraseological unit that has not only a “history”, it is considered by specialists. The article may not be good, but the subject matter is very significant. Книжная пыль (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.