The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^talk 22:15, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hannibal Tabu

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable writer. Currently there is only two links in the article, both to primary websites. I can't find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources to meet WP:GNG and there is no evidence he meets WP:AUTHOR. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no third-party sources, no assertion of notability. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ 14:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nothing for the needed solid independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 21:20, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 10:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: My closure of this discussion has been contested; relisting for further comments. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:48, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:58, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. No sign of significant coverage in reliable sources. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 10:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.