The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hannon Hill[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

prod2 that was suddenly contested minutes before expiry by single-edit IP. I cannot find significant third-party coverage in reliable sources for this company. Haakon (talk) 10:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 10:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 10:43, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Yet another company whose sole claim of notability is being "fastest growing" together with hundreds of others. Unless someone can provide evidence that their products have been noted, I don't think this article is encyclopedic. Their Cascade Server was speedily deleted as G11. Very little coverage, even in specialized venues like EContent [1]. Gets a few blips in CMS Watch, [2], and it is covered in 12 pages in their paywalled report, but that's a publication with very limited audience. [3]. KMWorld also has little coverage [4]. So, it's about on par with Vialect, the maker of Noodle (software) in my view. Tony Byrne, the owner of CMS Watch, rates it as "toward the bottom" of the market (together with EPiServer, Refresh, Clickability and CrownPeak) in his "The WCM marketplace" 2008 article KMWorld article [5]. Does not pass WP:GNG in my view. Pcap ping 11:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.