The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:02, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another Naruto fan-character. Original research, fancruft. NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 04:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- NeoChaosX [talk | contribs] 04:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, when did Naruto become a Lifetime Television movie? Kidding aside, totally fanfic, OR, non-notable, etc. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 04:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:OR, WP:NN, WP:NOT, etc, etc. As NeoChaosX says, fancruft. Thε Halo ^Θ 10:38, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete Pure vanity page (A7). Only 2 Ghits from a single forum and utterly unnotable. The original author is also a single purpose account. Fanfic and RPG characters tend to fail WP:FICT anyways. Someone needs to post to the Naruto forums that fanfic characters aren't permitted on Wikipedia because we've been getting a lot of them in the last month. --TheFarix (Talk) 11:02, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fancruft? Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 11:35, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fanfic stuff. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:39, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fan fan WP:Vanity fan. Oh yeah, extremely overpowered as well. ColourBurst 14:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --- Hong Qi Gong 19:30, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete. Destroy all non-notable fanfic characters. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete fanfiction characters are not for wikipedia per WP:V, WP:OR, etc.. --Kunzite 12:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• The A7 speedy deletion criterion applies to real people, not to fictional characters. It is aimed at vanity pages. Fictional characters, being fictional, cannot write vanity encyclopaedia articles about themselves. Uncle G 23:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SD criteria need to be revised to include fanfiction. Don't fictional characters have real authors who can write vanity articles? --Kunzite 02:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, also overpowered Stu. Who the heck has both Byakugan and Sharingan? --Alexie 01:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.