The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - The "Film" is actually a Chinese TV Comedy ....., So technically there's no valid reason for deletion... and seeing as nom's not returned I'm closing as Speedy Keep (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 19:37, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Mother-in-Law, Pretty Daughter-in-Law[edit]

Happy Mother-in-Law, Pretty Daughter-in-Law (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film failing WP:NFILM. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:34, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Oppose this is a TV series not a film. How can you nominate a page without reading at least the first sentence? Timmyshin (talk)
• Keep Incorrect nom rationale; short drama series which seems to have gotten a good run. Seeing no reason for deletion at all. Nate • (chatter) 04:47, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 14:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Keep - Notable TV series that was run nationwide in China. Nominator obviously did not perform WP:BEFORE. -Zanhe (talk) 18:44, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.