- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:47, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Harry Anastasiou[edit]
- Harry Anastasiou (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This person isnt notable, and the only sources available belong to Anastasiou Obermallen (talk) 03:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, for some reason, the PRODder, de-PROD'd this article so it is not eligible for Soft Deletion and the discussion will be open at least for another week.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:29, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Hello Liz. I completely agree with the AfD being given more time to get more input. However, could you please reconsider the judgement about soft deletion being ineligible here? Given that the Prodder self-reverted when they decided to take it to AfD instead, I think it is very different to the usual situation of a Prod being disputed. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 06:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.