The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:17, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hawkaoao[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. A WP:BLP article with no effective sourcing. Potentially notable. scope_creep^Talk 15:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There is a newspaper article reference on the Chinese Wikipedia: [1]. A Google News search of the Chinese name seems to have a fair number of mentions, but I can't really tell if they are WP:RS or self-published. Jumpytoo Talk 04:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lot of primary references, profile page, discussion on scores/games, a lot of puff, interviews, PR and so on but I can't see much in the way on quality secondary sources. He should be notable as he has an enormous fan base. scope_creep^Talk 14:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify- potentially notable topic, but the article in its current state has many issues. 1292simon (talk) 08:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Because this is the english encyclopedia and we are not able to determine the notability; based on reading the editors who have commented before me on this AfD, the nominator, and myself. Until we get an editor with experience in this area who can help determine the notability for the English encyclopedia we should soft delete or WP:ATD draft. Wm335td (talk) 20:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.