The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 04:44, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hayagriba Tripathy

[edit]

Article reads like an hagiography of a subject who (with all due respect) does not meet wikipedia's notability guidelines. The article does not cite any sources and the only non-wikipedia-mirror result that a Google search throws up is this List of Pension/Family Pension cases authorised during the month of July,2006, which at least seems to indicate that the person exists. Abecedare 00:07, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following page on the same subject, on the same notability grounds as above:

Abecedare 00:13, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both per nom - hagiography is about right (!). Bigdaddy1981 01:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both - He serves on a board that isnt notable. There's no mention of any references and nothing notable in the article Corpx 04:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. Once one deletes the worthless fluff (the entire "Social service", "Spiritual leanings", and "Personal traits" sections) there is very little left that seems notable or sourcable. —David Eppstein 16:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.