The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The references are insufficient to establish notability under WP:BIO. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:04, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hazrat Sayed Mehboob Ali Shah Chishti Nizami[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find sources to establish notability for subject or BAZME CHIRAG-E-FAQIR CHISHTI INTERNATIONAL. I note that much of this article is not about the subject. Dougweller (talk) 12:07, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 17 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 10:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment. This article has NO references, except mention of a website with no link. Tapered (talk) 03:01, 19 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Delete as it seems like a fan page by User:CHISTHI.ZA consisting entirely of original research. Notability or even accuracy of the claims regarding the person in the pictures both seem sketchy. MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:38, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 00:21, 25 February 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Keep- seems notable can be improved. Shabiha (talk) 17:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

- - Question - how can you say he seems notable without providing sources? If you didn't look for them, you can't know what the actual facts are about him, if you did and found some sources showing notability you should provide them, and if you didn't find any... Dougweller (talk) 17:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment: It's been about three weeks and nobody has been able to prove the subject's notability. What happens next? MezzoMezzo (talk) 09:27, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Strong keep-This Sufi is enough notable.I have added references and sources to validate my claim.Most often even notable Sufis dont have official pages on internet that does not mean they are not notable.Here there are sources and references.His Sufi shrine is located in South Africa not so much Muslim concentrated country. Shabiha (talk) 06:54, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Comment Looking at other !votes of yours, it appears that you haven't read, or possibly have read and disagree with, our guidelines at WP:People. Having an official website, or even not having one, is completely irrelevant. We have specific requirements about notability that are described at WP:People, which ones of those does the subject meet? Dougweller (talk) 09:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delete There are absolutely no references verifying any of the claims sufficient to substantiate any of the commentary. Until those issues are remedied, strong delete. Kabirat (talk) 07:12, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.