The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 18:27, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Header Creator[edit]

Header Creator (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software, looks like written by the software creator (judging by the username) - self promotation and contains no references. 12dstring (talk) 15:35, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - unreferenced; no 3rd party refs to establish notability; created by an SPA as potentially promotional. Dialectric (talk) 03:37, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no coverage whatsoever in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:36, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Not notable enough to handle an article on its own. —Hahc21 15:54, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.