The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Another problematic article. As with some of my other nominations, I could not find any reliable sources to establish the notability of this group. Of the sources listed, the first one does not cover the group in detail, and the last two are potential security threats as I could not get either link to work, and the second link is the website of the article. So, fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG, WP:N, and WP:V. ArcAngel (talk) ) 09:16, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That si correct but you could make the same claims for any hacker group or more "preotected" community (for example Anonymous). The links wont work anymore because milworm is down. if you search for the stuff you find mirrors and OSDB entries. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.231.113.119 (talk) 20:43, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]