The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to History of Victoria. Consensus to delete; as the article dates back to 2005, I've left a redirect to the History of Victoria article...which dates back to 2002! The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History of Port Phillip and Victoria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unreferenced article on an important subject, all of whose content is contained in other referenced articles, and the content of which is not worthy of retention Crusoe8181 (talk) 11:19, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. All the information is covered in other (better) articles. Jenks24 (talk) 04:30, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.