The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 03:45, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

HolidayMe[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A WP:PROMO page on an unremarkable online travel agency. Does no meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Significant RS coverage cannot be found; what comes up is trivial mentions and self-promotion link. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:05, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:06, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This small business recently obtained $7 million in financing. That simple fact does not establish notability, as this is routine in the world of business. I see no significant coverage of the company in independent, reliable sources, but rather just the routine coverage that any small business gets if it sends out a few press releases. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:57, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Promotional article about non-notable subject. RollingFace99 (talk) 08:01, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. the refs are mostly only about early funding, which doesn't make an company notable--it's really just evidence of existence, for without that funding they wouldn't exist. The others are just PR. fro msources which have shown themselves to be non-discriminating . DGG ( talk ) 17:28, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
SNOW Delete and I'll note not only is the sourcing and information blatant advertising, the accounts all contain the exact advertising-only motivations, complete with one of them named "MyHolidays", there's literally nothing to sensibly improve or accept if it's all blatant. SwisterTwister talk 21:14, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.