The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carioca (talk) 00:47, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood Blood

[edit]
Hollywood Blood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Dubious. Does not verify claims. (EhJJ)TALK 01:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This one could have been nominated for speedy deletion. It isn't encyclopedic, it isn't sourced, it isn't notable. It isn't coherent. Real information on this subject is already likely contained in relevant articles on stage techniques. The "Seriously" at the end makes me think this is someone's idea of a joke, but I can't see what that is.Auspex1729 (talk) 06:26, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.