The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to GlaxoSmithKline. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Horlicks NutriQuest[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable mobile game app. Fails GNG. —teb728 t c 19:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 00:42, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This game has just released, hence the lack of notability. Plus it is only released in Pakistan. Give it some time —Frostbullet Frostbullet — Preceding undated comment added 03:39, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 17:23, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to GlaxoSmithKline. We do give it some time, but until then it stays deleted or moved to a userspace draft. Therticle topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had zero hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. Also those images are blatant copyright violations. The pharmaceutical company's page is a fine redirect target, where it can build out summary style, if even necessary. Please ((ping)) me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar 19:56, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 12:59, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.