The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No external reliable sources have been provided and I did an additional news search in case anyone in the discussion had missed anything. All that there was were a few passing mentions. no original research and verifiability are not negotiable and there is no point in having a 1 line stub of the form "Hyatt Regency Birmingham is a large hotel in Birmingham." If someone can find significant sourcing that meets WP:RS they are welcome to recreate the article. JoshuaZ 16:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hyatt Regency Birmingham (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unnotable hotel, like thousands of others. Clarityfiend 21:55, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as common and non-notable chain hotel. Bearian 21:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I agree that the Birmingham building is not notable although, you're saying non-notable hotel chain, euh Hyatt is one of the biggest international hotel chains.--JForget 23:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment. If I had meant to say that the Hyatt Regency was a nn chain, I would have nominated that article. Clarityfiend 00:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Bearian. Certainly a lovely building, but that doesn't make it notable, it just makes it aesthetically appealing. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete origional research--Sefringle^Talk 22:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Birmingham article.--JForget 23:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - not for the fact the fact that it is actually hotel, there are plenty of hotels in Birmingham which have articles, but for the building itself. It is a prominent landmark on Birmingham's skyline. - Erebus555 11:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep as what seems to be a fairly noteworthy building. That's not to say that every Hyatt hotel should have an article, of course. Adrian M. H. 21:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment needs more sources, though, to cover WP:V. Adrian M. H. 21:13, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Bearian. Its an abomination too, but I'm ignoring that in my "vote". Bigdaddy1981 16:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.