The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, nothing to merge. --Coredesat 03:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hyatt Regency Phoenix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Unnotable hotel, not even mentioned in Hyatt Regency#Notable properties. Clarityfiend 21:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, see the next entry. Bearian 22:01, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. With few exception (the Hyatt Regency O'Hare is a remote possibility), individual locations for a hotel chain don't tend to be notable. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete origional research--Sefringle^Talk 22:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Pheonix.--JForget 23:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I presume you mean Phoenix, AZ, but what's there to merge? It's a hotel, and doesn't fit into the scope of the article I just linked to. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:49, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 16:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.