The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CTJF83 22:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HyperCast[edit]

HyperCast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Taking this to AfD as an article with this name was previously AfDed, I don't know if the content was the same or not.

Prod reason was: "No indication the software meets the notability guidelines." OSborn ^arf_contribs. 04:55, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the PROD rationale; I honestly thought it was web content, which is why I tagged it A7, but this works just as well (and shows you how much I know about computing). The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 05:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JohnCD (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: this is the same software as before, but the article is considerably fuller, though still showing no independent references: relisting to see whether anyone can find any. JohnCD (talk) 15:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)notability[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:43, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note If you are looking for citations, try looking at http://www.comm.utoronto.ca/hypercast/papers.html Guy Macon (talk) 08:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep - per Guymacon.--BabbaQ (talk) 18:27, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.