The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:30, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ICASE 2009

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has no sources and is not notable, according to my search on the internet there is only coverage of a conference in 2009, no further links could be found for later conferences. The article was made by an author who is associated with the institute creating the event, showing a COI Gsingh (talk) 19:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article is basically a conference report; its last paragraph bears the hallmarks of being a copy of a news story on what one person said at the conference, but that is (a) unreferenced and (b) insufficient to demonstrate notability of the conference itself. AllyD (talk) 13:46, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The conference shows no evidence of being notable. Sławomir Biały (talk) 15:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.