The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSpecialUser ^TSU 06:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I Am (2010 American film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An August 2010 AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am (2010 film) was closed as "userfy". The consensus at an August 2012 MfD at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stefanhajek/I Am (2010 film) was to return the article to the mainspace and list at AfD to determine whether the film passes Wikipedia:Notability (films). I am neutral. Cunard (talk) 20:34, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep and continue WP:CLEANUP. Now that someone deciding to MFD an article userfied two years ago resulted in it being returned to AFD, we can look to see if it has perhaps enough coverage finally to meet WP:GNG and thus WP:NF. Now that he thing has been released, a different set of Find sources shows us enough so that all this needs is a little wiki-love, not deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This releases 2010 film asserts notability. It clearly passes GNG, having been mentioned in adequate reliable sources. External links provided as well. But yes, cleanup is needed. Though not deletion. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 10:41, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.