- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was move to I Am (2010 American film) and list at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I Am (2010 American film). Cunard (talk) 20:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- User:Stefanhajek/I Am (2010 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I wonder if this userfied article sub page should be deleted. I have added brief information on this film to Mariners Church, and this may be enough. editor seems to have abandoned the effort. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:17, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps move it back to article space and let AfD decide again. The AfD noted August 2010 was too soon for the 2010 film to be notable, but that was over a year and a half ago. The draft isn't in that bad of shape and moving it to article space may bring other editors to improve it. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:39, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment i am perfectly open to that, though i suspect it wont survive.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Is this a different film than I Am (2010 film)? Sure sounds like it. Ego White Tray (talk) 03:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
-
- I just moved the page to User:Stefanhajek/I Am (2010 American film), which better matches up with how Wikipedia disambiguates. I don't think IMDB's disambiguation system is particularly good. If this page ever becomes an article, we'd want to move the other one to I am (2010 Indian film) Ego White Tray (talk) 12:21, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.