The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ialdabaoth/Valefor[edit]

Ialdabaoth/Valefor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This fictional weapon article does not establish notability independent of its series. Without non-trivial coverage in reliable third party sources, it is mostly made up of unnecessary plot summary and original research. TTN (talk) 22:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:28, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - entirely in-universe, thus not within our WP:WAF guidelines; does not show how these entities are notable outside the game (WP:N). Marasmusine (talk) 14:35, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AS Soleares/AS Alegrías - I realize that's also an ongoing AfD but it covers essentially the same content and it's 4-0 atm for not having articles. Nifboy (talk) 00:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete original research. In addition, title violates WP:NAME as it has the appearance of a subpage. B.Wind (talk) 04:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.