The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Also of note, the criteria under WP:NMUSIC is a major label, not a notable label. kelapstick^(bainuu) 00:49, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Igorrr[edit]

Igorrr (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability; fails WP:GNG and WP:NMG. Λeternus ^(talk) 18:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

• Keep: To me, Igorrr is a notable artist/band. According to the notability criteria for music: Igorrr has four albums on Ad Noiseam, a 12-year old label with a roster containing tens of artists and bands who seem to deserve their own Wikipedia pages, which meets criterion 5 in the list: "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable)." A simple Google search gives hundreds of albums reviews and interviews by independent media, including renowned websites, French and international. Here is a list of reviews and interviews for his 2012 "Halleluyah" album alone. 85.171.44.43 (talk) 10:37, 19 February 2015 (UTC) — 85.171.44.43 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Keep: I completely agree, this is nothing more than respecting the Wikipedia's terms.

I wrote a more complete article here, contesting the deletion of the Igorrr page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aeternus David. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpolkiujhy (talk • contribs) 11:21, 19 February 2015 (UTC) — Mpolkiujhy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Keep:Igorrr is definitely a notable artist. Precursor in the electronic scene and a donor of fresh air in the metal music according to numerous reviews such as Les Inrocks, Trax, Rock 'a' Rolla, Side-Line, Sputnik, etc.

His "Chicken's Symphony" made really a buzz and it was diffused in Canal + and the Japanese TV NHK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D4ofrssoUQ&feature=youtu.be Canal+ : http://www.canalplus.fr/c-infos-documentaires/c-ms-l-oeil-de-links/pid7534-l-emission.html?vid=1199284 NHK Tv: https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10152612560643049&set=vb.241913148048&type=2&theater — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bagienna (talk • contribs) 11:49, 19 February 2015 (UTC) — Bagienna (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Delete: Nope, not convinced. YouTube and Facebook aren't reliable sources, and a teensy indie label doesn't become a "major" indie label just because it has some artists whom someone thinks ought to have Wikipedia articles. I appreciate that the band has some fans, and I'm sure they'll do a bang up job of creating a fan site somewhere. It just doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Nha Trang ^Allons! 18:40, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep:It seems like they're using Facebook or YouTube to make it easier for us to check how popular the band is, but obviously, we can find the same informations on the official sites. NHK : ^[1] and Dour Festival : </ref>http://www.dourfestival.eu/artist/detail/Igorrr/</ref>.

I know about NHK as the biggest TV in Japan and Dour Festival as the most popular festival in all Europe (almost 200.000 people this last years when Igorrr was playing ^[2]). According to the post I see above, Igorrr was apparently interviewed by Canal+, this makes the Igorrr place in Wikipedia definitely relevant to me. 79.194.6.98 (talk) 08:50, 20 February 2015 (UTC) — 79.194.6.98 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Keep:User Nha Trang wrote: 'a teensy indie label doesn't become a "major" indie label just because it has some artists whom someone thinks ought to have Wikipedia articles'. I was saying that this "teensy indie label" has tens of artists who already have their own Wikipedia pages, i.e. recognized as significants artists. Sorry if I did not make this clear in my first comment.

Also, I know that 'YouTube and Facebook aren't reliable sources', but the Facebook link I provided gives, in turn, links to tens of reviews and interviews of Igorrr, some of which you may think are notable. Finally, about the current sockpuppet investigation, I just want to mention that Aeternus, who filed this article for deletion, also launched the SPI when he saw three people coming here to defend Igorrr and Ad Noiseam. In fact, the head of Ad Noiseam posted something on Youtube about hiw the Ad Noiseam and Igorrr pages were filed for deletion, and some of us "fans" came here to defend them. The FB pos was not a call: we fans decided to give our opinion. 85.171.44.43 (talk) 09:09, 20 February 2015 (UTC) — 85.171.44.43 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: There is a major canvassing and meatpuppetry going on, as someone has apparently made a Facebook call to defend Igorrr's notability. Also, there is an ongoing sockpuppet investigation involving users Mpolkiujhy and Bagienna. --Λeternus ^(talk) 09:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Seems that the label who released his four albums proved its notability very recently as a major indie label [[1]], so the 5th point of notability criteria for music artists seems to be filled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.72.85.185 (talk) 07:56, 3 March 2015 (UTC) — 89.72.85.185 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.