The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:36, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Iking Ferry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails notability, no WP:RS, clearly paid PR, all signs of undisclosed paid editing. Drewserbs (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Drewserbs (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Drewserbs (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:33, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Clearly not notable. I feel like it should speedied as unambiguous advertising or promotion. HandsomeBoy (talk) 21:07, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not meet notability criteria. Coldupnorth (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The sources don't seem reliable. If he has won awards, we also need to see reliable citations for it, not just mentions, in which case he may meet WP:MUSICBIO. MartinWilder (talk) 01:21, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per nom. User:Em-mustapha ^talk 03:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's not any RS to demonstrate his notability. Brayan ocaner (talk) 15:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete — fails to meet our notability threshold as they lack in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. Celestina007 (talk) 18:14, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom.-Xclusivzik (talk) 09:24, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.