The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While "fancruft" is not a good deletion reason, lack of notability and NOTSTATS are. Despite the low input, I am going to close this as unqualified delete given the copyright concerns - an alphabetic list of fish by size is unlikely to carry a copyright due to lack of originality, but other similarities such as in text may, and the treshold is really low. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Illinois Fishing Records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fancruft, fails WP:GNG. Possible copyvio of http://www.landbigfish.com/staterecords/records.cfm?state=Illinois The Banner talk 12:14, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:59, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:14, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It is a copyright violation. Everything in the article is copied from the website. If not considered a violation, WP:NOTSTATS....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:26, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.