The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Keeper | 76 14:32, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Imama Mdia

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source is for the official website of the academy from which the members of this organization graduated - hardly a reliable source for the purposes of WP:GNG. Additionally, the academy itself has also been nominated for AfD, as has most of the articles for affiliated bodies, due to issues with WP:ADVERT. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:51, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - self published. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:30, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Lack of sources, lack of notability, lack of any reason to maintain this page. Ducknish (talk) 02:13, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.