The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 17:02, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Imoblife[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I could find a single review of this company's product, but not enough to establish WP:CORPDEPTH. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 18:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The number of references from prweb.com should give a clue as to the nature of this bunch of references left at the end of the article. I was unable to find any independent in-depth coverage of this topic, a requirement of WP:GNG. What's left is automated listings, press releases, facebook pages and other promotional materials. The article also makes no specific claim to notability. This is just another company. Companies, even if they are big, aren't inherently notable, see WP:CORP. - Metal lunchbox ^(talk) 03:28, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - poorly referenced software article of unclear notability. Refs provided are PR, an incidental mention, and a download site, none of which constitutes significant RS coverage. A search turned up no significant RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 02:03, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Promotional puff piece, fails GNG.LM2000 (talk) 04:55, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.