The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing a few hours early per WP:SNOW. Hog Farm _Talk 19:09, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Index of Suriname-related articles[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This type of list can be considered depecrated, per this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this AFD. The community does not need an index to get "access" to Surinamese topics. Geschichte (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:28, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete At this point, there is enough of a precedent to start a bulk AfD and/or mass PROD of country indices, and any further singular nominations could be construed as disruptive if there is not a peculiarity like the one I described in the recent Malawi nomination. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 23:31, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Precedent is now set to remove all these Index lists as is being currently done with the others. -Imcdc (talk) 02:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete... per everyone. Deprecated list and precedent has been set already to remove all others. Ajf773 (talk) 09:45, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this isn't at all useful and there's clearly a consensus to delete lists of this type. So I can't think of a good reason to keep it. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:50, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Would be useful if we didn't had the categories and wikiprojects. TolWol56 (talk) 16:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.