The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Indialog Publications

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable references provided.References are links belonging to the company itself.Just published a few authors but no book has been a big hit or best seller.No significant charity work done nor it has published significant books.Was tagged but still not provided with reference.Seems like promoting a publishing house.--Poet009 (talk) 11:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- —SpacemanSpiff 14:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- —SpacemanSpiff 14:56, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - does not meet WP:ORG--Sodabottle (talk) 16:31, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing significant in this publishing house--Poet009 (talk) 07:59, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —SpacemanSpiff 17:24, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:Article's subject doesn't fulfill conditions of WP:ORG, didn't find something worthy/reliable which could signifies its notability. Bill william compton (talk) 14:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.