The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 04:06, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indraprastha Abasan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The estate do not meet notability per WP:GNG. No significant coverage in WP:RS. Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 11:38, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I started this article in 2005, when I did not know much about WP:GNG. Afterwards, I forgot about this article. Thanks Amartya for bringing it up here. Yes, this does not meet notability, and should be deleted.--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realised that you created this article. Hope you didn't mind. :) Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 15:37, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I did not mind :) This was one of the earliest articles I created, and completely forgot it exists.--Dwaipayan (talk) 20:02, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Deleteshould be removed immediately. Jussychoulex (talk) 17:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wow, That is defiantly not notable. Wilbysuffolk (Talk to me!) 18:59, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.