The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 19:20, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ines de Ramon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable coverage per WP:BLP; not in-depth, celebrity gossip sources, notability is not inherited by who a person is married to or dates. BilCat (talk) 17:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, and Switzerland. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find anything that isn't about her relationship to Brad Pitt in recent news - because there's just so much of it. Refining a search to before 2021 just gets hits about her relationship with her previous famous boyfriend. Setting the range back to before that relationship started, I found nothing at all. If anyone manages to find notable coverage in the deluge of celebrity gossip pieces, feel free to ping me for a reconsider. -- asilvering (talk) 21:35, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I concur. I'll be continuing to watch the discussions here to see if notable coverage is discovered. BilCat (talk) 22:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per Asilvering exactly. If there is any coverage that isn't based on her being a specific movie star's girlfriend, I will be happy to change my mind, but this seems to be a case of WP:NOTINHERITED. We bend that rule/essay for First Ladies, etc., but (a) Brad Pitt is not the President, and (b) girlfriend is generally not a lifetime status. --GRuban (talk) 18:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I have similarly failed to find evidence of her own importance. Suitskvarts (talk) 11:36, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.