The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. RockMagnetist(talk) 16:40, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Innovative Research Inc.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found nothing aside from the Scholar results to suggest improvement and there isn't even that much in this article. This orphan has rarely been edited much less significantly so I hope we can get some attention to this. Inviting tagger Johnanth for comment. SwisterTwister talk 06:00, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is hardly anything non-academic either, and I place less emphasis on academic sources than most. One would think the company doesn't even exist from the internet search results. Hence my motion to delete. Yannis A. ^✆|☑ 10:57, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:21, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:50, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The little bit of results are only passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG. Me5000 (talk) 19:59, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 12:57, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the article and a Google search indicate that the subject does not meet WP:ORG criteria.--Rpclod (talk) 03:41, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.