The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Insects as food[edit]

Insects as food (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic is a WP:FORK of entomophagy, a simple synonym, and the articles should be merged or simply redirected (though the article's principal current editor has cut materials from entomophagy, so some restoration will be needed). I am sorry that it is necessary to have to bring this back to AfD, but a significant admission has been made by the article's creator, acknowledging the synonymy of the two terms. He asserts that the concept of 'edible insect' (a class of objects) differs from 'insects as food', which is plainly true, but does not affect the fact that here we have a straightforward fork with two articles covering the same topic. This article needs to be redirected to Entomophagy, which means the use of insects as food. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural speedy keep. It is not beneficial to open a new AfD on the same day the previous one closed just because you didn't like the result. The nom's rationale brings nothing new to the debate. The so called significant admission by the article creator is merely a restatement of their already known position. SpinningSpark 16:33, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep Nothing to see here that adds significantly to the just-closed discussion. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep This is AFD spamming. —Lowellian (reply) 18:53, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.