The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:28, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Institute of International Professionalism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Out of process move by a new account with a declared COI after several draft declines. I'm not seeing even an assertion notability here, but mindful of systemic bias and language issues so bringing it here for conversation Star Mississippi 14:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Schools, and Myanmar. Star Mississippi 14:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Article shows no proof of notability. WP:MILL. Give me a feeling of promo. The Banner talk 16:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC
• Delete. Sourcing relies solely on directory entries that are based on primary source contributions. While locating reliable secondary sources remains a challenge in Asian countries, nonetheless our WP:N requirement cannot be met by primary sources and directories. Devoid of secondary WP:RS, this article fails WP:GNG. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 10:21, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.