The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 07:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

InstrumentChamp[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. Essentially no secondary coverage, or information on the game at all from any source other than the game's fundedbyme page. The article's creator looks to be an SPA as well. Loafiewa (talk) 03:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Loafiewa (talk) 03:40, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:08, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I considered nominating this a few weeks/months back when I added the logo but didn't feel confident in my decision at the time. Searching for sources again and seeing another editor's support, I now feel like deletion is warranted and support this nomination. DocFreeman24 (talk) 04:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
InstrumentChamp seems very much like an important . And I have tried it with my piano, guitar and drums. I hope it will stay on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.208.79.174 (talk) 09:44, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A previous instance of this article, by the same WP:SPA, was rejected at AfC in 2012. Regarding this version created in mainspace in 2015, the crowdfunding page is not sufficient for notability here and searches are not finding better than occasional press releases and routine listings. Fails WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 10:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:GNG failure and the above comments. IceWelder [✉] 16:12, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.